Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 18:48
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
4 of the Healthiest Cooking Oils to Use—and 3 You Should Limit, According to Dietitians - EatingWell
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Earth’s oldest living creature unearthed—dating back 700 million years - The Brighter Side of News
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
What does 'Whose flesh is like the flesh of donkeys’ mean (Ezekiel 23:20)?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Thank you.
What’s next?
How do I remove frizz from hair?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Water Discovered Around a Young, Sun-Like Star For First Time - ScienceAlert